Custom systems development
When off-the-shelf tools don't fit how you work, we design and build tailored systems—enquiry pipelines, job flows, handovers—that plug into what you already use.
Custom systems development is for service businesses that have outgrown generic tools. You need enquiry pipelines, job flows, or handover systems that match how you actually work—and that plug into the CRM, inbox, and spreadsheets you already use. We design and build those systems when off-the-shelf software doesn't fit.
What this actually means in practice
Most teams start with a CRM, a project tool, or a spreadsheet. Over time, the way work really flows—multiple intake channels, specific handoffs, particular reporting—doesn't align with how those tools are designed. You end up with workarounds, duplicate entry, or "shadow" processes that live in someone's head.
Custom development fills the gap. We build the enquiry pipeline that routes leads from your form, email, and job boards into one place. We build the job router that assigns work, tracks status, and hands over to delivery. We build the bits that connect your existing tools and encode your real process. The result is a system that fits you, not the other way around.
We don't build for the sake of it. We build when the architecture and workflow design show that off-the-shelf options won't do, or when the glue between your tools is the real bottleneck.
When this becomes necessary
You've tried configuring a standard product, but the process keeps bending. Or you're stitching things together with spreadsheets and manual handoffs, and it's not scaling.
- Your intake comes from several places (web, email, job boards, phone), but no single tool gives you one pipeline.
- Handoffs between sales and delivery, or between teams, rely on manual updates and chase-ups.
- You need reporting or visibility that your current tools don't provide without heavy customisation.
- You're duplicating data across systems because nothing talks properly to anything else.
- The way you work is specific enough that generic software constantly feels like a compromise.
How we typically approach this
Defining scope from the architecture
We start from a clear view of your flows—usually from an operational architecture or discovery phase. We agree what we're building: which intake sources, which handoffs, which integrations, and what "done" looks like. We avoid scope creep by fixing the boundaries up front.
Designing the workflow and data model
We map the workflow—states, ownership, triggers—and the data we need to support it. We keep it simple. We show you wireframes or flow diagrams and iterate until the design matches how you work. What we build is based on this, not on guesswork.
Building in phases
We deliver in phases so you see progress early. A first phase might be intake and routing; a later one handovers or reporting. Each phase has clear deliverables and sign-off. We use your feedback to adjust the next phase.
Integrating with your existing tools
We connect to your inbox, CRM, forms, or job systems via their APIs or simple automation. We don't rip and replace unless the architecture says we should. The custom system sits in the middle, orchestrating what you already have.
Testing and handover
We test with real-like data and scenarios. We hand over documentation, access, and a clear explanation of how to run and maintain the system. We'll support you through go-live and fix any teething issues.
What you end up with
You get a system that reflects your process and plugs into your current tools. It's yours to run and evolve.
- Working system—enquiry pipeline, job router, handover flow, or similar—that matches your workflow.
- Integrations with your existing tools (inbox, CRM, spreadsheets, etc.).
- Documentation and handover so your team can operate and extend it.
- Clear foundation for future phases (e.g. reporting, automation) if you need them.
Tools we work with
We build on top of what you use. The custom layer connects inbox, CRM, job or project tools, spreadsheets, and automation or reporting where it makes sense. We might use low-code platforms, APIs, or lightweight back ends depending on your context. We mention typical categories (e.g. CRMs, form builders, workflow tools) only to place our work; we don't push specific vendors.
Common pitfalls we see (and how we avoid them)
Building before the workflow is clear. It's tempting to jump into development. We insist on a defined workflow and data model first. We design, then build. That avoids costly rework.
Overbuilding. Custom systems can grow into monsters. We scope tightly and deliver in phases. We add complexity only when the architecture and your process justify it.
Ignoring existing tools. Some teams want to replace everything. We prefer to integrate. Reuse what works; build the glue and the workflow. That reduces cost and change for your team.
Poor handover. A system you can't run or change is a liability. We document clearly, hand over access, and make sure someone on your side understands how it works. We're available for support if you want it.
Typical outcomes
You end up with a system that fits your process instead of forcing you to fit its. Typical examples: one place for all enquiries, faster allocation and handover, and less duplicate entry or chasing. We don't promise specific metrics; we build to the agreed workflow and let you measure what matters.
A short example from the field
Illustrative example. A professional services firm took enquiries from their site, LinkedIn, and referrals. Each went into a different inbox or spreadsheet; partners decided who'd respond. We built a small intake pipeline that fed everything into one list, assigned by practice area, with simple status tracking. It connected to their existing email and CRM. Follow-up time dropped, and they could see at a glance what was open and who owned it.
FAQs
Why not just use a CRM or project tool?
Many businesses do. But when your process doesn't match how those tools are designed—multiple intake sources, specific handoffs, particular reporting—you end up bending the tool or working around it. We build what fits your flow.
How long does a typical build take?
It depends on scope. A focused enquiry pipeline or job router might be a few weeks. A larger system with several integrations could be a few months. We agree phases and deliverables before we start.
Do we have to replace our existing tools?
Usually no. We integrate with your CRM, inbox, spreadsheets, or job systems. The custom piece is the glue and the workflow—the bits that off-the-shelf tools don't handle well.
Who owns the system once it's built?
You do. We hand over documentation, access, and enough understanding for your team to run and iterate. We can offer ongoing support if you want it.
What if our process changes?
Good systems are built to evolve. We design for the way you work now and for likely changes. Smaller tweaks you can often do yourselves; bigger shifts might need us back in.
What technology do you use?
We choose based on your context: reliability, maintenance, and how it connects to your existing tools. We'll explain the stack clearly and avoid unnecessary complexity.
Next step
If you've hit the limits of off-the-shelf tools and need something that fits how you work, custom systems development is the next step. We'll scope it from your architecture and workflow, then build in phases. Get in touch to discuss your setup, or read about how we work.